Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 113 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Women to pray in GC? #168409
    HSAB
    Participant

    Agreed bluebird! It’s embarrassing that its 2013 and his is a first!

    in reply to: The "New & Everlasting Covenant" / Polygamy #168459
    HSAB
    Participant

    I do not believe in polygamy and it has always bothered me. Even at the times I was the strongest in my testimony. My friend recently shared this link with me. It doesn’t make it all better, but the changes/additionals to our scriptures are definitely getting a little better IMO. One little bit at a time…

    http://bycommonconsent.com/2013/02/28/groundbreaking-scriptural-heading-changes-dc-132-and-official-declaration-1/

    in reply to: The "New & Everlasting Covenant" / Polygamy #168456
    HSAB
    Participant

    hawkgrrrl wrote:

    You just have to make your own way and not care about what others think of you because the approval of other church members is not worth the cost to your authenticity.


    Love this!

    in reply to: Women to pray in GC? #168395
    HSAB
    Participant

    I think the whole point of it isn’t that women not praying in conference is such a huge deal…it’s just one step at a time. At least that’s how I see it. I want people to ask why things are the way they are instead of just accepting things because that’s the way they’ve always been.

    in reply to: WoW Rehash: Beer is ok?? Things I never noticed #168266
    HSAB
    Participant

    When I found this in the WOW I was shocked-but there are other drinks from grains like barley water.

    in reply to: Women to pray in GC? #168392
    HSAB
    Participant

    Ha ha 😆

    in reply to: As man is rears its head again #168349
    HSAB
    Participant

    I had to read this whole thread to understand what the big deal was. We obviously teach that. It’s gospel 101. It is the milk, not the meat.

    in reply to: Women to pray in GC? #168387
    HSAB
    Participant

    Hooray!!!! I think it is very likely that the let women pray in conference thing made the big guys consider it. Either way, makes me happy!

    in reply to: Does it matter if it’s true? #167958
    HSAB
    Participant

    Thanks for all the insight! I love hearing everyone’s opinions on this. For the record, my kids do not actually exist yet 😆 I just am thinking about all this way in advance so that I will (hopefully) feel more like I know what I want to teach them when they do come. Sometimes I think the things I like most about the church are the general Christian values, and it makes me wonder if it even matters what church I belong to.

    Then there’s also a long list of pro’s and con’s that I weigh because I want to believe that we have eternal families, but I don’t want to (and don’t at all) believe in polygamy. It almost seems like if it was true I would be able to accept and believe in all of it, not just parts of it. I think it does matter to me if it’s true. Maybe what I’m unsure about is how much it matters and what that means to my life.

    in reply to: DC 132 why? #167588
    HSAB
    Participant

    Just because we don’t actively teach it in Sunday school or seminary does not mean that we don’t learn it. We read it in seminary, then we read it every time we read D&C. I cannot tell you how many times I have cried over this scripture. And also how many fights I have gotten in from college on with returned missionaries telling me that polygamy is a celestial law. My husband even said that on his mission he and his companion decided it must be a celestial law because of the scripture that we have.

    This scripture is so offensive and contradictory to everything that I am taught/feel about who I am.

    I am a daughter of God, Who loves me, but not enough to let me have my own husband or make my own choices about who else he can marry?

    I don’t know a single woman who has peace with this. The closest that they come to having peace seems to be ‘I believe that the church is true, so I don’t like it but maybe I’ll understand it in the eternities.’

    in reply to: A question about mission age from my 10yo daughter… #166934
    HSAB
    Participant

    This question is so so sad. That is what worries me most about staying in the church-the day that my daughters see what I view as sexism. I think what you told her is the best possible answer you could give her. Because we don’t really have an answer.

    I would be hesitant though, to tell her we are equal but different in the church. One day she may realize that is just not true any definition of the world equality that she has been taught at school.

    On Own Now wrote:

    It is part of priesthood responsibility. Sisters are “not under the same mandate.” Simply put, priesthood holders are supposed to serve, and their obligation is to serve 2 years, beginning as early as age 18. Sisters may serve if they so desire, and this optional service will be for 18 months starting as early age 19.

    I feel like we say this for everything in the church; women don’t serve in leadership outside of auxiliaries because it is a priesthood responsibility; women are the presided over in the home because presiding is a priesthood responsibility. It seems like the priesthood is a really great excuse for women to not have any authority, leadership or (which is probably the worst of all) accountability.

    Maybe I will start a new thread on that topic…

    in reply to: Heavenly Mothers? #167530
    HSAB
    Participant

    That is an interesting and actually really logical theory. I like it.

    in reply to: Heavenly Mothers? #167528
    HSAB
    Participant

    Ha ha ha! That would be a mind blow!

    in reply to: Heavenly Mothers? #167523
    HSAB
    Participant

    SamBee wrote:


    Am I right in thinking Abraham is the earliest polygamist in the Bible?

    I think the first one to practice it was Lamech, who was within the first few generations, but I think Abraham was the next one.

    One of the things that I like about the church is that we believe in a Heavenly Mother. One of the things I don’t like about the church is that she doesn’t actually exist in any tangible way. I recently decided to start praying to Heavenly Mother. When I prayed to her for the first time I felt bad that I was leaving Heavenly Father out. (Silly, I know) But I had an overwhelming feeling that they were both there and both listening and that they always had. A few people mentioned this, but I have been thinking the past few months that God is actually both, and that our whole Heavenly Father terminology may be a mistake.

    in reply to: Why I am a Mormon Feminist #163814
    HSAB
    Participant

    Also, Rebeccad, I would LOVE to write for the feminist movement, but I don’t know how to go about doing that really. I’ve emailed FMH a few times with no reply. Any suggestions?

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 113 total)
Scroll to Top