[notdeadyet]

We had a similar topic delivered on personal revelation in a talk this past Sunday. Disappointingly however, it focused far more on the notion of a polarized adherence to “the Gospel” (the speaker seemed to mean “Church policy,” but said Gospel) – meaning those that are “all in” qualify for revelatory blessings, while those who (let’s say) “seek” may not be. The takeaway being an implication that the only personal revelations that are valid are those that are merely confirming the position (or faith) of those who are committed to a precept regardless of revelatory confirmation. In other words, blame the seekers for still being seekers and credit the faithful for swallowing without chewing.

I, for one love counting myself among the hopeful uncertain. And like Joseph Smith and seemingly you, SunbeltRed have found my sincere uncertainty a far more rewarding motivation in seeking spiritual insight than guilt-driven adherence or disingenuous consent.

Very well-written talk friend, wish I could have heard it in person.

[notdeadyet]

mercyngrace wrote:

I would love the chance to meet everyone, too. Is there a chance any of you are in North Carolina?

Perhaps an outdated posting, but better late than never: I’m also in North Carolina and know of at least a few other members of the “community” in my area.

[Author]

Posts